Editorial & Sizing Policy
Review BraSizePRO's editorial standards, sizing methodology, source use, and limitations.
Evidence & Accuracy
BraSizePRO aims to distinguish measurement facts, sizing-system conventions, fit guidance, and interpretation. Sources are used where they can support a specific claim; unsupported precision or universal fit claims are avoided.
Key Editorial Principles
- Measurement-based starting points: Calculator results are presented as starting points rather than universally correct or medically authoritative sizes.
- Manufacturer variation: Brand and garment fit can differ. Where appropriate, users are directed to the current manufacturer's size chart rather than being given an unsupported universal adjustment.
- Fit over labels: Guides distinguish the clothing-size label from actual garment fit.
- Source transparency: Research and standards are used for claims they actually support. Anthropometric standards are not presented as a single universal bra-sizing formula.
- Inclusive scope: Body proportions, breast shape, posture, and garment construction vary. Where a calculator cannot account for those factors reliably, the result is described as a reference rather than a precise prediction.
What We Avoid
BraSizePRO avoids invented credentials, unsupported clinical claims, fabricated reviews or ratings, and brand accusations that cannot be substantiated. Brand-specific observations should be treated as product and style dependent unless supported by current evidence.